4.2 Article

Course of Metal Ions after a Revision of Malfunctioning Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Prostheses

Journal

MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/medicina57020115

Keywords

metal-on-metal hip prostheses; metal ions; hip revision; cobalt; chromium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the changes of cobalt and chromium in blood and urine after revision surgery from metal-on-metal to ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. Metal ions levels decreased significantly after revision, with cobalt levels near reference values and chromium levels reaching only 25% of pre-revision levels. While the revision led to a dramatic decrease in metal ions, it did not fully restore chromium levels.
The present research evaluated the course of cobalt and chromium in the blood and urine after the revision of metal-on-metal with a ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. Seven patients were enrolled for hip prosthesis revision owing to ascertained damage of the implant. Metals in the blood and urine were evaluated before and after the hip revision. The double measurement before the total hip revision revealed high levels of metal ions (on average, 88.1 mu g/L of cobalt in the blood, 399.0 mu g/g of creatinine cobalt in the urine, 46.8 mu g/L of chromium in the blood, and 129.6 mu g/g of creatinine chromium in the urine at the first measurements), with an increasing trend between the first and second dosage. Within a week after the hip revision, the levels of metal ions significantly decreased by approximately half. Four to six months after the operation, the cobalt levels were found near to the reference values, whereas the chromium levels reached 25% of the values measured before the revision. The revision of malfunctioning metal-on-metal implants produced a dramatic decrease of metal ions in biological fluids, although it did not completely rescue the chromium level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available