4.4 Article

Effect of an Epichloe endophyte on adaptability to water stress in Festuca sinensis

Journal

FUNGAL ECOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue -, Pages 39-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2017.08.005

Keywords

Epichloe endophytes; Festuca sinensis; Plant performance; Soil water content; Drought; Waterlogging

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB138702]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31502001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2016-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As water stress, including drought and waterlogging, can severely affect plant growth, this study investigated the effects of an endophyte from the genus Epichloe on two different ecotypes of Festuca sinensis grass under five soil water conditions in a controlled greenhouse experiment. Changes in F. sinensis plants grown with (E+) and without the endophyte (E-) were evaluated as they were subjected to different water treatments (20%, 35%, 50%, 65% and 80% relative saturation moisture content, RSMC). Growth parameters such as plant height, number of tillers, blade width, stem diameter, root length, total biomass, root-shoot ratio and relative water content were determined. The results showed that drought and waterlogging significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited the growth of F. sinensis. The presence of the endophyte significantly (P < 0.05) increased plant growth and root-shoot ratio under drought and waterlogged conditions. In addition, the plant height, number of tillers, blade width, stem diameter and total biomass in seedlings of both ecotypes reached the maximum at 65% RSMC, which suggests the optimal water condition. These findings also show that moderate drought (35% and 50% RSMC) could promote root growth of grass seedlings. Therefore, endophytic infections can result in enhanced host plant resistance to drought and waterlogged conditions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd and British Mycological Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available