4.7 Article

Heat transfer analysis in convective flow of Jeffrey nanofluid by vertical stretchable cylinder

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104965

Keywords

Jeffrey fluid; Nanofluid; Finite difference method; Magnetic field; Thermal radiation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the magnetohydrodynamic flow of unsteady Jeffrey nanofluid due to vertical stretchable cylinder, taking into account Joule heating and thermal radiation effects. The Buongiorno model is utilized to describe the nanofluid characteristics, and numerical solutions are obtained using the finite difference method (FDM). Results show that velocity decreases with higher Grashof number and stretching parameter, while temperature and concentration decrease with higher Brownian parameter, Prandtl number, and Schmidt number.
This paper studies the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow of unsteady Jeffrey nanofluid due to vertical stretchable cylinder. Joule heating and thermal radiation outcomes are additionally addressed. The Buongiorno model is utilized to describe the characteristics of nanofluid. The mathematical form of the problem consists of momentum, continuity, concentration, and energy equations. Suitable transformations are employed to obtain the dimensionless form. Numerical solutions for velocity, energy and concentration equations are obtained by the finite difference method (FDM). Impacts of various parameters (i.e. Prandtl number, Eckert number, Hartmann number, Grashof number, Deborah numbers, Brownian parameter, stretching parameter and Schmidt number,) on velocity, concentration, temperature, Nusselt and Sherwood number numbers are scrutinized graphically. Results show that velocity decays for higher Grashof number and stretching parameter. Temperature and concentration decreased for higher Brownian parameter, Prandtl and Schmidt numbers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available