4.3 Article

Taxonomy and phylogeny of the Auriculariales (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) with stereoid basidiocarps

Journal

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 8, Pages 689-715

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2017.05.001

Keywords

Heterobasidiomycetes; Internal transcribed spacer; Perennial basidiocarps; Wood-inhabiting fungi

Categories

Funding

  1. Core Facility Centre 'Cell and Molecular Technologies in Plant Science' at Komarov Botanical Institute RAS (St. Petersburg, Russia)
  2. Komarov Botanical Institute RAS [1201255604]
  3. Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre [knr. 44-15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, we investigate taxonomy of the Auriculariales with effused or cupulate, persistent basidiocarps; generic and species concepts are revised based on morphological and DNA evidences. The genus Eichleriella is reinstated to embrace ten closely related species with ellipsoid-ovoid basidia, and the genus type, Eichleriella incarnata, is placed to the synonyms of Eichleriella leucophaea. Eichleriella bactriana, Eichleriella desertorum and Eichleriella sicca are described as new to science. In addition, four species earlier treated as members of Exidiopsis or Heterochaete are combined to the genus. The genus name Heteroradulum (type Radulum kmetii) is introduced for seven species with large, obconical, stipitate basidia. Of them, Heteroradulum adnatum and Heteroradulum semis are described as new. Two new genera, Amphistereum (with two species, type Eichleriella schrenkii) and Sclerotrema (monotypic, type Exidiopsis griseobrunnea), are proposed; Hirneolina (monotypic, type H. hirneoloides) and Tremellochaete (with two species, type Exidia japonica) are restored as good genera. The type species of Heterochaete, H. andina, is congeneric with Exidiopsis (type E. effusa). 2017 British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available