4.2 Article

Buspirone Dose-Response on Facilitating Forelimb Functional Recovery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injured Rats

Journal

DOSE-RESPONSE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1559325821998136

Keywords

serotonin; cervical cord injury; neuromodulation; functional rehabilitation

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [H-ZG4 W]
  2. Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Fund [ITS/276/17]
  3. Telefield Charitable Fund [ZH3 V]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the dose-response of Buspirone treatment on reaching and grasping function in cervical cord injured rats, showing that the lowest dose group had the best performance in reaching scores and grip strength.
Buspirone, widely used as a neuropsychiatric drug, has also shown potentials for motor function recovery of injured spinal cord. However, the optimum dosages of such treatment remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the dose-response of Buspirone treatment on reaching and grasping function in cervical cord injured rats. Seventeen adult Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to reach and grasp sugar pellets before a C4 bilateral dorsal column crush injury. After 1 week post-injury, the rats were divided into 3 groups to receive 1 of 3 different dosages of Buspirone (i.p., 1 dose/day: 1.5, n = 5; 2.5, n = 6 and 3.5 mg/kg b.w., n = 6). Forelimb reaching and grip strength test were recorded once per week, within 1 hour of Buspirone administration for 11 weeks post-injury. Different dose groups began to exhibit differences in reaching scores from 4 weeks post-injury. From 4-11 weeks post-injury, the reaching scores were highest in the lowest-dose group rats compared to the other 2 dose groups rats. Average grip strength was also found higher in the lowest-dose rats. Our results demonstrate a significant dose-dependence of Buspirone on the recovery of forelimb motor functions after cervical cord injury with the best performance occurring at the lowest dose tested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available