Revealing Oz: Institutional Work Shaping Auditors' National Office Consultations*

National office consultations (NOCs) are a mechanism intended to enhance audit quality, consistent with the logic of professionalism inherent in the audit profession. Yet research indicates that the competing logic of commercialism has become institutionalized in audit firms. We examine how the coexisting and conflicting logics of professionalism and commercialism manifest themselves in the current NOC dynamic. Specifically, we interview 22 highly experienced Big 4 audit firm partners to investigate how key actors engage in institutional work that creates, maintains, and disrupts the influence of professionalism and commercialism in NOC practices. We observe a swing of the pendulum: in the wake of SOX, audit firms adopted professionalism-based practices which involved creating a more authoritative, Oz-like national office identity, while in recent years key actors' institutional work reconfigured NOC practices and placed a renewed focus on commercialism. Our findings bring to light a number of implications that offer opportunities for future research. Although the new client-inclusive culture aims to improve audit outcomes by encouraging consultations and fostering open dialogue with clients, it also exposes the national office to relationship-management pressures and client-service demands. Thus, practices developed to uphold professionalism also created a channel for commercialism-focused practices, leading to unintended second-order effects.

Automated summary

Research has shown the competition and conflict between professionalism and commercialism in national office consultations in audit firms. After SOX, audit firms adopted professionalism-based practices, but in recent years commercialism has become dominant. The new client-inclusive culture aims to encourage consultations and open dialogue, but also leads to unintended second-order effects.