Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Comparison of Single-Response Format and Forced-Choice Format Instruments Using Thurstonian Item Response Theory
David M. Dueber et al.
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT (2019)
Does Forcing Reduce Faking? A Meta-Analytic Review of Forced-Choice Personality Measures in High-Stakes Situations
Mengyang Cao et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY (2019)
Effects of Applicant Faking on Forced-Choice and Likert Scores
Goran Pavlov et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2019)
Amazon Mechanical Turk in Organizational Psychology: An Evaluation and Practical Recommendations
Janelle H. Cheung et al.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY (2017)
The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model With 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth, Fidelity, and Predictive Power
Christopher J. Soto et al.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2017)
Equivalence of Narcissistic Personality Inventory constructs and correlates across scoring approaches and response formats
Eunike Wetzel et al.
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY (2016)
Developing Pairwise Preference-Based Personality Test and Experimental Investigation of Its Resistance to Faking Effect by Item Response Model
Satoshi Usami et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING (2016)
Which Personality Attributes Are Most Important in the Workplace?
Paul R. Sackett et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Not too little, but not too much: The perceived desirability of responses to personality items
Patrick D. Dunlop et al.
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY (2012)
A Plea for Process in Personality Prevarication
Nathan R. Kuncel et al.
HUMAN PERFORMANCE (2011)
Methods of Measuring Faking Behavior
Gary N. Burns et al.
HUMAN PERFORMANCE (2011)
Forced-choice and conventional personality assessment: Each may have unique value in pre-employment testing
Richard D. Goffin et al.
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (2011)
Statement Desirability Ratings in Forced-Choice Personality Measure Development: Implications for Reducing Score Inflation and Providing Trait-Level Information
Patrick D. Converse et al.
HUMAN PERFORMANCE (2010)
Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five
Colin G. DeYoung et al.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2007)
Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior
Richard L. Griffith et al.
PERSONNEL REVIEW (2007)
A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures
Scott A. Birkeland et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT (2006)
Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: Evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance
ED Heggestad et al.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY (2006)
Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment
ND Christiansen et al.
HUMAN PERFORMANCE (2005)
Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories
JA Johnson
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY (2005)
Share Paper
