4.3 Article

An Assessment of Ambient Water Quality and Challenges with Access to Water and Sanitation Services for Individuals Experiencing Homelessness in Riverine Encampments

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 389-401

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2020.0319

Keywords

caffeine; dry weather; fecal pollution; social science and engineering collaboration; sucralose; water quality

Funding

  1. San Diego River Conservancy
  2. California State Water Resources Control Board, Region 9
  3. San Diego State University Division of Graduate Affairs
  4. City of San Diego

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research found detectable levels of caffeine and sucralose in water samples near homeless encampments, suggesting anthropogenic contamination sources. However, there was insufficient evidence to show that the encampments were major contributors to river pollution. Service providers believe providing water and sanitation services to this population would be expensive, and most riverbank residents avoid contact with service providers, posing challenges for service provision.
Individuals experiencing unsheltered homelessness face significant barriers to accessing water, sanitation, and hygiene services, but the risks associated with this lack of access and barriers to service provision have been largely understudied. We analyzed water samples upstream and downstream of three homeless encampments in the San Diego River watershed and interviewed service providers from public and nonprofit sectors to assess local perceptions about challenges and potential solutions for water and sanitation service provision in this context. Water upstream from encampments contained detectable levels of caffeine and sucralose. Escherichia coli concentrations downstream of the encampments were significantly greater than concentrations upstream, but there was no significant change in the concentrations of other pollutants, including caffeine and sucralose. The HF183 marker of Bacteroides was only detected in one sample upstream of an encampment and was not detected downstream. Overall, there was insufficient evidence to suggest that the encampments studied here were responsible for contributing pollution to the river. Nevertheless, the presence of caffeine, sucralose, and HF183 indicated that there are anthropogenic sources of contamination in the river during dry weather and potential risks associated with the use of this water by encampment residents. Interviews with service providers revealed perceptions that the provision of water and sanitation services for this population would be prohibitively expensive. Interviewees also reported perceptions that most riverbank residents avoided contact with service providers, which may present challenges for the provision of water and sanitation service unless trust is first built between service providers and residents of riverine encampments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available