4.6 Article

A multi-institutional retrospective study of hyperthermic plus intravesical chemotherapy versus intravesical chemotherapy treatment alone in intermediate and high risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer

Journal

CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 308-317

Publisher

CHINA ANTI-CANCER ASSOC
DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0125

Keywords

Nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer; intravesical chemotherapy; hyperthermia; chemohyperthermia; retrospective study

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972918]
  2. Guangzhou Major Clinical Technology Program [2019ZD16]
  3. Guanzhou Municipal Special Clinical Technology Project [2019TS40]
  4. Guangzhou Key Medical Discipline Construction Project Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In intermediate and high risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer patients, HIVEC+IVEC therapy showed higher 2-year recurrence-free survival and lower incidence of radical cystectomy compared to IVEC therapy, with similar 5-year overall survival rates for both treatments.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) and intravesical chemotherapy (IVEC) in patients with intermediate and high risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after transurethral resection. Methods: We included 560 patients diagnosed with primary or recurrent NMIBC between April 2009 and December 2015 at 1 of 6 tertiary centers. We matched 364 intermediate or high risk cases and divided them into 2 groups: the HIVEC+IVEC group Ichemohyperthermia (CHT) composed of 3 consecutive sessions followed by intravesical instillation without hyperthermia] and the IVEC group (intravesical instillation without hyperthermia). The data were recorded in the database. The primary endpoint was 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) in all NMIBC patients (n = 364), whereas the secondary endpoints were the assessment of radical cystectomy (RC) and 5-year overall survival (OS). Results: There was a significant difference in the 2-year RFS between the two groups in all patients (n = 364; HIVEC+IVEC: 82.42% vs. IVEC: 74.18%, P= 0.038). Compared with the IVEC group, the HIVEC+IVEC group had a lower incidence of RC (P= 0.0274). However, the 5-year OS was the same between the 2 groups (P = 0.1434). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 32.7% of all patients, but none of the events was serious (grades 3-4). No difference in the incidence or severity of AEs between each treatment modality was observed. Conclusions: This retrospective study showed that HIVEC+IVEC had a higher 2-year RFS and a lower incidence of RC than IVEC therapy in intermediate and high risk NMIBC patients. Both treatments were well-tolerated in a similar manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available