4.7 Article

Migration and emission characteristics of Hg in coal-fired power plant of China with ultra low emission air pollution control devices

Journal

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 158, Issue -, Pages 272-280

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.01.020

Keywords

Hg emission; Air pollution control devices; Ultra low emission; Power plants

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Program (973) of China [2014CB238904]
  2. National Key Technologies RD Program [2016YFB0600604]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [U1510201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The emission and migration characteristics of Hg from an ultra low emission (ULE) coal-fired power plant in China was investigated. During the tests, the flue gas was sampled simultaneously at the inlet and outlet of selective catalytic rethiction (SCR) system, low temperature economizer (LTE), electrostatic precipitators (ESP), wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD), and wet electrostatic precipitators (WESP) by EPA 30B method. The feed coal, lime, limestone slurry, process water, fly ash, bottom ash, gypsum, FGD effluent, and WESP effluent were also sampled. The results showed that Hg concentration in flue gas at the outlet of boilers and stacks was in the range of 4.46-5.17 mu g/m(3) and 0.51-122 mu g/m(3), respectively. The overall gaseous Hg removal efficiencies of SCR + LTE + ESP + WFGD + WESP equipped in the ULE power plant were about 88.5%-89.6%. Mass distribution of Hg in the whole system showed that about 70% of Hg present in solid and liquid combustion products and 30% of Hg emitted into atmosphere. After ULE reformation, the atmospheric emission factor of the power plant is in the range of 0.39-0.81 g/TJ, which is much lower that of power plants before ULE reformation (2.18-2.34 g/TJ). Thus, the ULE reformation for coal-fired plants is beneficial for the reduction of Hg emission to atmosphere. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available