4.2 Article

Reaction rates and the noisy saddle-node bifurcation: Renormalization group for barrier crossing

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013156

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF Graduate Research fellowship [DGE-1650441]
  2. NSF [DMR-1719490]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study discusses calculations of barrier crossing in chemical reaction-rate theory, stating that particles typically cross a barrier when the barrier is larger than the temperature. However, when the barrier disappears, particles slide down a sloping potential instead. The authors propose a renormalization group description of this noisy saddle-node transition and derive universal scaling behavior and corrections to scaling for mean escape time in overdamped systems. They also develop an accurate approximation to the full distribution of barrier escape times by approximating the eigenvalues of the Fokker-Plank operator as equally spaced.
Barrier crossing calculations in chemical reaction-rate theory typically assume that the barrier is large compared to the temperature. When the barrier vanishes, however, there is a qualitative change in behavior. Instead of crossing a barrier, particles slide down a sloping potential. We formulate a renormalization group description of this noisy saddle-node transition. We derive the universal scaling behavior and corrections to scaling for the mean escape time in overdamped systems with arbitrary barrier height. We also develop an accurate approximation to the full distribution of barrier escape times by approximating the eigenvalues of the Fokker-Plank operator as equally spaced. This lets us derive a family of distributions that captures the barrier crossing times for arbitrary barrier height. Our critical theory draws links between barrier crossing in chemistry, the renormalization group, and bifurcation theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available