4.7 Article

Pyrolysis process using a bench scale high pressure thermobalance

Journal

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 345-354

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.07.020

Keywords

Pyrolysis; Pressure; HP-TGA; Kinetics; Char

Funding

  1. Regional Government of Castilla-La Mancha [PEII-2014-007-P]
  2. Spanish government [FPU15/02653]
  3. Sociedad Espanola de Catalisis (SECAT Introduccion a la investigacion en Catalisis Grant)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of the pressure and other operating conditions such as particle size, sweep gas flow and initial sample weight on the cellulose pyrolysis process using a bench scale plant high pressure thermobalance was evaluated. The particle size and the sweep gas flow did not have a great influence on the pyrolysis process. Nevertheless, initial sample weight altered the thermochemical behavior of the pyrolysis process. Moreover, a comparison of the values of the kinetic parameters obtained from pyrolysis experiments performed at lab and bench scale was established. On the other hand, the morphology, the presence of functional groups, the surface area, the proximate analysis and elemental analysis of the chars obtained were studied. Moreover, the evolved gases from the pyrolysis performed at different pressures were also analyzed. An increase of pressure led to both a decrease in the temperature at which pyrolysis took place and an increase in the char yield. Furthermore, the higher the pressure, the higher the porosity, the lower the pores size and the higher the occurrence of alkanes and carbonyl components in the resulting chars were. Finally, the gas released analysis from the pyrolysis process by mass spectrometry showed that high pressures promoted the CH4 and CO2 formation, the H-2 yield being practically negligible. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available