4.6 Article

Kinetics of competing exchange of oxygen and water at the surface of functional oxides

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 2805-2811

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp04953k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. World Premier International Research (WPI)-I2CNER
  2. EPSRC-JSPS Core-to-Core Program, Advance research Network [EP/P026478/1]
  3. FRINATEK of the Research Council of Norway [262393]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the oxygen transport kinetics under humidified oxygen conditions through isotopic exchange depth profiling. It reveals that the surface exchange coefficient of water is higher than that of molecular oxygen, suggesting that water tends to occupy the active exchange sites at the material surface and exchange oxygen more rapidly than molecular oxygen.
The presence of water vapour in the input gas stream influences the performance of air electrodes of solid oxide cells. In this work, the oxygen transport kinetics were determined by isotopic exchange depth profiling at 350 degrees C on polycrystalline La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-delta samples in humidified oxygen, comparing the differences in tracer diffusion profile using either O-18(2) or (H2O)-O-18 as the labelling medium. The apparent surface exchange coefficients of oxygen were determined in each case and used together to estimate the oxygen surface exchange coefficients of molecular oxygen and water. It was found that, in humid conditions, the surface exchange coefficient of molecular oxygen is significantly decreased in comparison to a reference in dry conditions. In addition, the surface exchange coefficient of water is higher than that for molecular oxygen. This is in good agreement with the hypothesis that, water monopolises the active exchange sites at the material surface and thus oxygen from water exchanges faster than the one of molecular oxygen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available