4.0 Review

Remdesivir therapy in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal

ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 43-48

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.051

Keywords

Coronavirus; SARS virus; Antiviral agents; Therapeutic uses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that treatment with remdesivir reduces the likelihood of COVID-19 patients needing mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and increases the chances of early and late discharge, but has no impact on mortality rates.
Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that examined remdesivir treatment for COVID-19. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials. gov to identify studies published up to October 25, 2020 that examined COVID-19 treatment with remdesivir. A total of 3 randomized controlled trials that consisted of 1691 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Results: The odds for mechanical ventilation (MV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) following treatment was significantly lower in the remdesivir group compared to the control group (OR = 0.48 [95% CI: 0.34; 0.69], p < 0.001). The odds of early (at day 14/15; OR = 1.42 [95% CI: 1.16; 1.74], p < 0.001) and late (at day 28/29; OR = 1.44 [95% CI: 1.16; 1.79], p = 0.001) hospital discharge were significantly higher in the remdesivir group compared to the control group. There was no difference in the odds for mortality in patients treated with remdesivir (OR = 0.77 [95% CI: 0.56; 1.06], p = 0.108). Conclusions: Remdesivir attenuates disease progression, leading to lower odds of MV/ECMO and greater odds of hospital discharge for COVID-19 patients. However, remdesivir does not affect odds of mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available