4.7 Article

Encapsulation of Au55 Clusters within Surface-Supported Metal- Organic Frameworks for Catalytic Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol

Journal

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 522-528

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.0c02842

Keywords

SURMOF; Au cluster; liquid-phase epitaxy; catalysis; conductivity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21673032]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [DUT18RC(3)055]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020T130532]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Xiamen University [201812]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [2082/1.390761711]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates a facile method to encapsulate ligand-stabilized Au-55 clusters within SURMOF thin films, confirmed by various analytical techniques. Computational modeling shows a strong interaction between Au-55 core and the MOF pore ligands, resulting in the removal of PPH3 ligands. The stabilized Au-55 clusters within SURMOF exhibit excellent catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol.
We demonstrate a facile approach to encapsulate ligand-stabilized Au-55 clusters [Au-55(PPh3)(12)Cl-6] within highly oriented surface-supported metal-organic framework (SURMOF) thin films via liquid-phase epitaxy. The Au-55 clusters were successfully loaded into the pores of SURMOF during their fabrication, which has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction, infrared spectroscopy, and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy. Computational modeling reveals that there is a strong interaction between the Au-55 core and the oligophenyl ligands of the MOF pore, leading to a removal of the PPH3 ligands. The stabilized Au-55 clusters within SURMOF exhibit excellent catalytic activity for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available