4.8 Article

Large-scale farmer-led experiment demonstrates positive impact of cover crops on multiple soil health indicators

Journal

NATURE FOOD
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 97-103

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00222-y

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that cover crops had small but increasing impacts on soil health indicators over 5 years, with active carbon concentration responding most rapidly. Soil texture, trial duration, and farm-level random effect were also strongly related to soil health properties. Overall, the results suggest that cover crops can begin to influence soil health within several years after adoption.
Assessing the effects of cover crops on soil health under real-world conditions requires a comprehensive dataset. A farmer-led trial on 1,522 strip-years from 78 farms across 9 US states over 5 years reveals improvements in key soil indicators, with active carbon concentration responding the most rapidly. Cover crops are touted for their potential agronomic and environmental benefits, and are currently incentivized through state, federal and private investment in the USA. There is a need to quantify the impact of on-farm use of cover crops at spatial (2-5 years) and temporal (regional-to-national) scales aligned with such investment programmes. Here we report soil health data from a farmer-led trial of cover crops on 1,522 strip-years, from 78 farms across 9 US states over 5 years. We found that up to 5 years of cover crop use had small but increasing impacts on four of six selected soil health indicators, with active carbon concentration responding the most rapidly. Soil texture, the length of time a field was in the trial and a farm-level random effect were also strongly related to soil health properties. Our results fit with evidence from controlled trials and suggest that the use of cover crops can begin to influence soil health within several years after adoption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available