4.1 Article

Weight loss and adherence to postoperative follow-up after vertical gastrectomy for obesity treatment

Journal

ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA
DOI: 10.1590/ACB360203

Keywords

Bariatric Surgery; Gastrectomy; Obesity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effectiveness of vertical gastrectomy in treating obese patients was analyzed in a retrospective observational study, showing significant weight loss and satisfactory excess weight loss percentage for adherent patients. Factors such as gender and age also influenced the outcomes, with older patients showing lower excess weight loss percentage compared to other groups.
Purpose: To analyze the effectiveness of vertical gastrectomy in the treatment of obese patients, adherence to clinical follow-up and the influence of factors such as gender and age. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational and descriptive study, conducted with patients undergoing vertical gastrectomy, operated at Hospital Sao Domingos, between January 2016 and July 2018. Results: Most patients undergoing vertical gastrectomy were female (n = 193, 72.28%) and had a mean age of 37.11 +/- 8.96 years old. The loss of follow-up was 56.18%. Among adherent patients (n = 117; 43.82%), most patients were female (n = 89; 76.07%) and had a mean age of 37.92 +/- 9.85 years old. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the adherents in the preoperative was 37.85 +/- 3.72 kg/m(2). Both BMI and excess weight (EW) showed a statistically significant difference between pre- and postoperative period. Percentage of excess weight loss (% EWL) was satisfactory for 96.6% of adherent patients. Older patients had a statistically significant lower % EWL compared to the other groups. Conclusion: Vertical gastrectomy was effective in the treatment of obese patients, with significant weight loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available