4.7 Article

Pyrolysis of forest residues: An approach to techno-economics, for bio-fuel production

Journal

FUEL
Volume 193, Issue -, Pages 477-484

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.063

Keywords

Pyrolysis; Techno-economics; Forest residues

Funding

  1. USDA-NIFA-BRDI (ARS) [2012-10008-20271]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science (UMaine) [DE-FG02-07ER46373]
  3. U.S. Department of Transportation (UMaine) [DTRT13-G-UTC43]
  4. National Science Foundation, Sustainable Energy Pathways (UMaine) [1230908]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1230908] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The techno-economics for producing liquid fuels from Maine forest residues were determined from a combination of: (1) laboratory experiments at USDA-ARS's Eastern Regional Research Center using hog fuel (a secondary woody residue produced from mill byproducts such as sawdust, bark and shavings) as a feedstock for pyrolysis to establish product yields and composition, and (2) Aspen Plus (R) process simulation for a feed rate of 2000 dry metric tons per day to estimate energy requirements and equipment sizes. The simulated plant includes feedstock sizing and drying, pyrolysis, hydrogen production and hydrotreatment of pyrolysis oils. The biomass is converted into bio-oil (61% yield), char (24%) and gases (15%) in the pyrolysis reactor, with an energy demand of 17%. The bio-oil is then hydrotreated to remove oxygen, thereby producing hydrocarbon fuels. The final mass yield of gasoline/diesel hydrocarbons is 16% with a 40% energy yield based on the dry biomass fed, this yield represents a fuel production of 51.9 gallons per dry metric ton of feedstock. A unique aspect of the process simulated herein is that pyrolysis char and gases are used as sources for both thermal energy and hydrogen, greatly decreasing the need to input fossil energy. The total capital investment for a grass-roots plant was estimated to be US$427 million with an annual operational cost of US$154 million. With a 30 year project life, a minimum fuel selling price was determined to be US$6.25 per gallon. The economic concerns are related to high capital costs, high feedstock costs and short hydrotreating catalyst lifetimes. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available