Journal
FUEL
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages 254-266Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.024
Keywords
Moisture; Low-carbon fuel; Alternative fuel; Moisture meter; Accuracy; Variability
Categories
Funding
- Carbon Management Canada
- Ontario Centres of Excellence
- Queen's University
- Lafarge Canada
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The moisture content (MC) of a fuel is generally determined through gravimetric analysis where a sample is dehydrated in an oven over a period of approximately 24 h; the MC is then calculated by dividing the difference between the initial and final mass, by the initial mass. Handheld moisture meters offer the benefit of near-instantaneous measurements and should provide accurate and dependable results. The performance of nine moisture meters applied to seven low-carbon fuels (LCFs) was determined. The nine meters employed three measurement technologies: electrical conductance/resistance, electrical capacitance and electromagnetic inductance. The seven LCF samples considered were: shredded switch-grass, two batches of shredded wood, two batches of ragger tails and two batches of sanitary products. A moisture meter applicable for LCF should have a clear relationship between the actual MC and the measured MC, low variability, and be accurate within an absolute difference of 2%. Results indicated that none of the meters were suitable for use on LCF in general. It was not possible to identify a specific measurement technology that performed better for a certain LCF type from the results. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available