4.2 Article

Patient Preferences in Rare Diseases: A Qualitative Study in Neuromuscular Disorders to Inform a Quantitative Preference Study

Journal

PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 601-612

Publisher

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00482-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking [115966]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
  3. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)
  4. Wellcome Trust Award [203105/Z/16/Z]
  5. Wellcome Engagement Enrichment award [203105/Z/16/B]
  6. Wellcome Trust [203105/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This qualitative study aimed to explore unmet healthcare needs and treatment preferences for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and mitochondrial myopathies (MM) through interviews and focus group discussions with patients and caregivers. The study found that muscle strength and energy were the most mentioned unmet needs, with balance, cognition, and gut function being the top desired treatment benefits. Risk acceptability was influenced by previous experiences and the distinction between permanent and temporary risks, with concerns mainly focused on liver, kidney, and eye damage.
Introduction It has become increasingly important to include patient preference information in decision-making processes for drug development. As neuromuscular disorders represent multisystem, debilitating, and progressive rare diseases with few treatment options, this study aimed to explore unmet health care needs and patient treatment preferences for two neuromuscular disorders, myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and mitochondrial myopathies (MM) to inform early stages of drug development. Methods Fifteen semi-structured interviews and five focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with DM1 and MM adult patients and caregivers. Topics discussed included (1) reasons for study participation; (2) disease signs/symptoms and their impact on daily lives; (3) top desired benefits; and (4) acceptability of risks and tolerance levels for a hypothetical new treatment. Data were analyzed following a thematic 'code' approach. Results A total of 52 participants representing a wide range of disease severities participated. 'Muscle strength' and 'energy and endurance' were the disease-related unmet needs most often mentioned. Additionally, improved 'balance', 'cognition' and 'gut function' were the top desired treatment benefits, while 'damage to the liver, kidneys or eyes' was the most concerning risk. Factors influencing their tolerance to risks related to previously having experienced the risk and differentiation between permanent and temporary risks. A few differences were elicited between patients and caregivers. Conclusions This qualitative study provided an open forum to elicit treatment-desired benefits and acceptable risks to be established by patients themselves. These findings can inform decisions for developing new treatments and the design of clinical trials for DM1 and MM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available