4.6 Article

Multivariate volatility forecasts for stock market indices

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 484-499

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.06.012

Keywords

International stock markets; Lasso; Option-implied variance; Realized variance; Volatility spillover

Funding

  1. European Union [832671]
  2. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [832671] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study forecasts volatility of major international stock market indices through a multivariate modeling approach, showing that including different components of volatility information can improve forecast accuracy. It demonstrates that cross-market spillover effects have long-term forecasting power, and using option-implied variance substantially enhances forecast accuracy after considering lag structures.
Volatility forecasts aim to measure future risk and they are key inputs for financial analysis. In this study, we forecast the realized variance as an observable measure of volatility for several major international stock market indices and accounted for the different predictive information present in jump, continuous, and option-implied variance components. We allowed for volatility spillovers in different stock markets by using a multivariate modeling approach. We used heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR)-type models to obtain the forecasts. Based an out-of-sample forecast study, we show that: (i) including option-implied variances in the HAR model substantially improves the forecast accuracy, (ii) lasso-based lag selection methods do not outperform the parsimonious day-week-month lag structure of the HAR model, and (iii) cross-market spillover effects embedded in the multivariate HAR model have long-term forecasting power. (C) 2020 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available