4.3 Review

Review on forward and reverse genetics in plant breeding

Journal

ALL LIFE
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 127-135

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/26895293.2021.1888810

Keywords

Forward genetics; reverse genetics; Mutagen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forward genetics involves identifying the gene responsible for a mutant phenotype, while reverse genetics analyzes the phenotype following disruption of a known gene. Various methods such as chemical treatment and X-rays are used to generate random mutations in organisms, and genetic variation is measured using markers across the genome.
Forward genetics is the identification and characterization of the gene that is responsible for the mutant phenotype. It starts with the measurement or observation of a phenotype followed by mapping of the causative loci or genes. In addition, forward genetic approaches are, unbiased in terms of gene identification since the phenotype is the primary level of measurement. Reverse genetics, on the other hand, analyzes the phenotype of an organism following the disruption of a known gene. To generate random mutations in an organism, various approaches such as X-rays, ultraviolet irradiation and chemical treatment are used. Genetic variation across the genome is measured using a set of markers that can distinguish between the two or more strains used in an experimental cross. The source of these markers has changed over the years with advances in technology and knowledge of genomic structure. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are single nucleotide changes that are also detectable by PCR, and millions of them exist between inbred strains, providing even greater resolution for genetic mapping. Two of the most widely used mutagens for chemical mutagenesis experiments are ethylmethanesulfonate and ethylnitrosourea. The objective is to review approaches and use of reverse and forward genetics in plant breeding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available