4.6 Article

Machine learning to alleviate Hubbard-model sign problems

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 103, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.125153

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [12070131001, 196253076 - TRR110]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-93ER-40762]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper demonstrates that neural networks can be trained to parametrize suitable manifolds for interacting systems with a sign problem, significantly reducing computational costs for small volume systems. The method is particularly effective in solving severe sign problems in nonbipartite systems like the tetrahedron Hubbard model.
Lattice Monte Carlo calculations of interacting systems on nonbipartite lattices exhibit an oscillatory imaginary phase known as the phase or sign problem, even at zero chemical potential. One method to alleviate the sign problem is to analytically continue the integration region of the state variables into the complex plane via holomorphic flow equations. For asymptotically large flow times, the state variables approach manifolds of constant imaginary phase known as Lefschetz thimbles. However, flowing such variables and calculating the ensuing Jacobian is a computationally demanding procedure. In this paper, we demonstrate that neural networks can be trained to parametrize suitable manifolds for this class of sign problem and drastically reduce the computational cost for different severely afflicted small volume systems. In particular, we apply our method to the Hubbard model on the triangle and tetrahedron, both of which are nonbipartite. At strong interaction strengths and modest temperatures, the tetrahedron suffers from a severe sign problem that cannot be overcome with standard reweighting techniques, while it quickly yields to our method. We benchmark our results with exact calculations and comment on future directions of this work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available