4.7 Article

Factors controlling the productivity of tropical Andean forests: climate and soil are more important than tree diversity

Journal

BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 1525-1541

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-18-1525-2021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Ho3296/2, Ho3296/4, Le762/10]
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study indicates that the productivity of highly diverse Neotropical montane forests is primarily controlled by thermal and edaphic factors and stand structural properties, while the impact of tree diversity is minimal.
Theory predicts positive effects of species richness on the productivity of plant communities through complementary resource use and facilitative interactions between species. Results from manipulative experiments with tropical tree species indicate a positive diversity-productivity relationship (DPR), but the existing evidence from natural forests is scarce and contradictory. We studied forest aboveground productivity in more than 80 humid tropical montane old-growth forests in two highly diverse Andean regions with large geological and topographic heterogeneity and related productivity to tree diversity and climatic, edaphic and stand structural factors with a likely influence on productivity. Main determinants of wood production in the perhumid study regions were elevation (as a proxy for temperature), soil nutrient (N, P and base cation) availability and forest structural parameters (wood specific gravity, aboveground biomass). Tree diversity had only a small positive influence on productivity, even though tree species numbers varied largely (6-27 species per 0.04 ha). We conclude that the productivity of highly diverse Neotropical montane forests is primarily controlled by thermal and edaphic factors and stand structural properties, while tree diversity is of minor importance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available