4.6 Article

ON THE VALIDITY OF COMPLEX LANGEVIN METHOD FOR PATH INTEGRAL COMPUTATIONS

Journal

SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages A685-A719

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/20M1363224

Keywords

complex Langevin method; gauge cooling; lattice field theory

Funding

  1. Academic Research Fund of the Ministry of Education of Singapore [R-146-000-291-114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through in-depth analysis of the complex Langevin method and its limitations, we reveal that the absence of localized probability density functions leads to unstable behavior, while the gauge cooling technique helps confine samples in certain cases, significantly broadening its application.
The complex Langevin (CL) method is a classical numerical strategy to alleviate the numerical sign problem in the computation of lattice field theories. Mathematically, it is a simple numerical tool to compute a wide class of high-dimensional and oscillatory integrals. However, it is often observed that the CL method converges but the limiting result is incorrect. The literature has several unclear or even conflicting statements, making the method look mysterious. By an indepth analysis of a model problem, we reveal the mechanism of how the CL result turns biased as the parameter changes, and it is demonstrated that such a transition is difficult to capture. Our analysis also shows that the method works for any observables only if the probability density function generated by the CL process is localized. To generalize such observations to lattice field theories, we formulate the CL method on general groups using rigorous mathematical languages for the first time, and we demonstrate that such localized probability density function does not exist in the simulation of lattice field theories for general compact groups, which explains the unstable behavior of the CL method. Fortunately, we also find that the gauge cooling technique creates additional velocity that helps confine the samples, so that we can still see localized probability density functions in certain cases. Thereby, the gauge cooling method significantly broadens the application of the CL method. The limitations of gauge cooling are also discussed. In particular, we prove that gauge cooling has no effect for Abelian groups, and we provide an example showing that biased results still exist when gauge cooling is insufficient to confine the probability density function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available