4.7 Article

Multiple models guide strategies for agricultural nutrient reductions

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 126-132

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fee.1472

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Erb Family Foundation [856]
  2. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [1313897]
  3. Joyce Foundation [15-36415]
  4. NOAA [NA13OAR4310142]
  5. Great Lakes Protection Fund
  6. International Plant Nutrition Institute [58-3604-4-005]
  7. NSF [GRT00022685]
  8. Ohio Sea Grant to Ohio State University
  9. USDA [58-3604-4-005, 59-3604-4-001]
  10. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  11. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1114934] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Directorate For Engineering
  13. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1313897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In response to degraded water quality, federal policy makers in the US and Canada called for a 40% reduction in phosphorus (P) loads to Lake Erie, and state and provincial policy makers in the Great Lakes region set a load-reduction target for the year 2025. Here, we configured five separate SWAT (US Department of Agriculture's Soil and Water Assessment Tool) models to assess load reduction strategies for the agriculturally dominated Maumee River watershed, the largest P source contributing to toxic algal blooms in Lake Erie. Although several potential pathways may achieve the target loads, our results show that any successful pathway will require large-scale implementation of multiple practices. For example, one successful pathway involved targeting 50% of row cropland that has the highest P loss in the watershed with a combination of three practices: subsurface application of P fertilizers, planting cereal rye as a winter cover crop, and installing buffer strips. Achieving these levels of implementation will require local, state/provincial, and federal agencies to collaborate with the private sector to set shared implementation goals and to demand innovation and honest assessments of water quality-related programs, policies, and partnerships.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available