Journal
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 359-365Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fee.1515
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- SD Bechtel Jr Foundation on natural and working lands in California's climate portfolio
- Stanford's Anne and Reid Buckley Fund
- Dachs Fellowship
- Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Are forest offsets an effective way to address climate change, and do they provide other benefits? In some climate-change mitigation policies, industries and individuals can purchase offsets that compensate for their greenhouse-gas emissions by reducing emissions elsewhere. However, offsets may undermine mitigation efforts, by potentially giving carbon credits for emissions reductions that would have occurred even without the offset program in place. We evaluate California's forest offset program - the first-ever legally enforceable compliance offset program for existing forests - to determine whether offsets (1) provide additional emissions reductions that would not have occurred without the program (called additionality) and (2) yield other benefits. We found that California's forest offset program, comprising a small portion of the state's mitigation portfolio, does not inhibit overall emissions reductions. Further, the program advances stringent additionality of emissions reductions through multiple mechanisms. Finally, mitigation through forest offsets can yield a suite of important co-benefits. Lessons from California's experience with forest offsets can help to inform other offset programs that are increasingly being developed around the world.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available