4.1 Review

Clinical utility of current biomarkers for prostate cancer detection

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 1-13

Publisher

KOREAN UROLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.4111/icu.20200395

Keywords

Biomarkers; Diagnosis; Prostatic neoplasms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although PSA testing for prostate cancer screening has limitations, it still plays an important role in reducing disease-specific mortality. Novel biomarkers have shown potential in aiding patient selection for biopsy and identifying men at risk for clinically significant prostate cancer. Further validation and research are needed to determine the clinical utility and commercial availability of these biomarkers.
Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remains the most used test to detect prostate cancer (PCa), the limited specificity and an elevated rate of overdiagnosis are the main problems associated with PSA testing. Over the last three decades, a large body of evidence has indicated that PSA screening methods for PCa are problematic, although PSA screening significantly reduces PCa-specific mortality. A number of novel biomarkers have been introduced to overcome these limitations of PSA in the clinical setting. These biomarkers have demonstrated an increased ability to select patients for biopsy and identify men at risk for clinically significant PCa. Although a number of assays require further validation, initial data are promising. Forthcoming results will ultimately determine the clinical utility and commercial availability of these assays. Extensive efforts have recently been made to identify and commercialize novel PCa biomarkers for more effective detection of PCa, either alone or in combination with currently available clinical tools. This review highlights the role of existing and promising serum and urinary biomarkers for the detection and prognostication of PCa before prostate biopsy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available