4.2 Article

Choices Matter: How Response Options for Survey Questions about Sexual Identity Affect Population Estimates of Its Association with Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Use

Journal

FIELD METHODS
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 335-354

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X21998516

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [R01AA025684, R01CA203809, R01CA212517, 1R01HD095920-01, R01DA031160, R01DA036541, R01DA043696]
  2. National Cancer Institute
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  4. National Institute on Drug Abuse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the design of survey questions on sexual identity can affect the associations between sexual identity and substance use behaviors, with open-ended questions possibly being more beneficial for accurately measuring sexual identity and estimating its associations with substance use behaviors.
This study presents results from a randomized experiment in the 2015-2017 National Survey of Family Growth, where a large national sample of U.S. individuals aged 15-49 was randomly assigned to one of two different versions of a survey question about sexual identity (one with three response options, including heterosexual, gay/lesbian, and bisexual, and one adding the option something else). Analyses of changes in the associations of sexual identity with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across these treatments revealed evidence of significant differences in the associations that remained robust after adjusting for socio-demographics. The results suggest that when individuals choose their sexual identity from a more limited number of response options, the heterogeneity of the sexual identity subgroups increases, weakening estimated associations of sexual identity with these behaviors. Open-ended questions may therefore be necessary to measure sexual identity and estimate its associations with substance use behaviors accurately in surveys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available