4.6 Article

On evaluating the potential of nanocomposites for heavy oil recovery

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13202-021-01112-6

Keywords

Nanocomposite; Nanoparticle; EOR; Heavy oil

Funding

  1. JSPS Kakenhi [JP 18H05852]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that the inclusion of NCP in formation brine can enhance oil recovery in heavy oil formations, with an increase in recovery rate of up to 14.1% when the NCP load is increased from 0.25 to 1 wt.%. Furthermore, by incorporating a surfactant (PVA), the oil recovery rate can reach 18.3%, which is 4% higher than using PVA alone.
The present work investigates potential of nanocomposite (NCP) for enhancing the production in heavy oil formation. NCP was extracted from bauxite ore and the spectral characterization revealed that NCP was a crystalline material whose matrix consists of 64.5 wt.% alumina oxide (Al2O3), 15.7 wt.% iron oxide (Fe2O3), and 19.8 wt.% silica oxide (SiO2). The nanocomposite fluid, obtained by dispersing NCP into the targeted formation brine, showed a good dispersion over the two first days beyond which a hetero-aggregation, visible to the naked eye, was observed. Coreflooding assays, performed on Berea sandstone saturated with a heavy mineral oil (rho = 0.854 g/cm(3)), revealed that 0.25wt.% of NCP dispersed in the formation brine yields a poor recovery. However, increasing the load in NCP from 0.25 to 0.75 wt.% and subsequently 1 wt.% using the same formation brine, showed an increase in the oil recovery up to 14.1% after the waterflooding stage. It was further found that the RF could be as high as 18.3% if 0.25 wt.% NCP was dispersed in a surface-active material (Polyvinyl alcohol, PVA in this study). The result was 4% higher than a scenario in which PVA was used alone. Moreover, it was shown that altering the composition of the preflush could increase the production to up to 11.3%. A comparative analysis with single nanoparticle revealed that the EOR using NCP was six-fold higher compared to that of SiO2 taken alone and 1.5-fold lower than those of Al2O3 or Fe2O3 taken alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available