4.5 Article

Laboratory validation of a compact single-scattering albedo (SSA) monitor

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 1635-1653

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-1635-2021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission, Seventh Framework Programme (IAGOS-ERI) [212128]
  2. IGAS [312311]
  3. H2020 Research Infrastructures (ENVRI PLUS) [654182]
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [01LK1301A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of the CAPS PMSSA was evaluated against proven technologies in an optical-closure study, showing good agreement in measuring scattering, extinction, and absorption coefficients. The CAPS PMSSA absorption measurements compared well with the PSAP measurements for small particle sizes and modest SSA values. The study concludes that the CAPS PMSSA is a robust and reliable instrument for direct measurement of scattering and extinction coefficients, with relative accuracy decreasing for larger SSAs and particle sizes.
An evaluation of the performance and relative accuracy of a Cavity Attenuated Phase-Shift Single Scattering Albedo Monitor (CAPS PMSSA; Aerodyne Research, Inc.) was conducted in an optical-closure study with proven technologies: Cavity Attenuated Phase-Shift Particle Extinction Monitor (CAPS PMex; Aerodyne Research, Inc.), three-wavelength integrating nephelometer (TSI Model 3563) and three-wavelength filter-based Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP; Radiance Research Inc.). The evaluation was conducted by connecting the instruments to a controlled aerosol generation system and comparing the measured scattering, extinction and absorption coefficients measured by the CAPS PMSSA with the independent measurements. Three different particle types were used to generate aerosol samples with single-scattering albedos (SSAs) ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 at 630 nm wavelength. The CAPS PMSSA measurements compared well with the proven technologies. Extinction measurement comparisons exhibited a slope of the linear regression line for the full dataset between 1.05 and 1.01, an intercept below +/- 1.5 x 10(-6) m(-1) (+/- 1.5 Mm(-1)), and a regression coefficient R-2 > 0.99, whereas scattering measurements had a slope between 0.90 and 1.04, an intercept of less than +/- 2.0 x 10(-6) m(-1) (2.0 Mm(-1)), and a coefficient R-2 > 0.96. The derived CAPS PMSSA absorption compared well to the PSAP measurements for the small particle sizes and modest (0.4 to 0.6) SSA values tested, with a linear regression slope between 0.90 and 1.07, an intercept of +/- 3.0 x 10(-6) m(-1 )(3.0 Mm(-1)), and a coefficient R-2 > 0.99. For the SSA measurements, agreement was highest (regression slopes within 1 %) for SSA = 1.0 particles at extinction levels of per tens of inverse megameters and above; however, as extinctions approach 0, small uncertainties in the baseline can introduce larger errors. SSA measurements for absorbing particles exhibited absolute differences up to 18 %, though it is not clear which measurement had the best relative accuracy. For a given particle type, the CAPS PMSSA instrument exhibited the lowest scatter around the average. This study demonstrates that the CAPS PMSSA is a robust and reliable instrument for the direct measurement of the scattering and extinction coefficients and thus SSA. This conclusion also holds for the indirect measurement of the absorption coefficient with the constraint that the relative accuracy of this particular determination degrades as the SSA and particle size increases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available