4.7 Article

DENet: A Universal Network for Counting Crowd With Varying Densities and Scales

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
Volume 23, Issue -, Pages 1060-1068

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2020.2992979

Keywords

Convolution; Estimation; Feature extraction; Loss measurement; Image segmentation; Computer architecture; Measurement uncertainty; Crowd counting; density estimation; detection

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [61725501, 61976037]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20121102110032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a network called DENet, consisting of a detection network and an encoder-decoder estimation network, for counting people or objects with varying scales and densities. Evaluation on three datasets shows that DENet achieves lower Mean Absolute Error (MAE) than state-of-the-art methods.
Counting people or objects with significantly varying scales and densities has attracted much interest from the research community and yet it remains an open problem. In this paper, we propose a simple but efficient and effective network, named DENet, which is composed of two components, i.e., a detection network (DNet) and an encoder-decoder estimation network (ENet). We first run the DNet on the input image to detect and count individuals who can be segmented clearly. Then, the ENet is utilized to estimate the density maps of the remaining areas, typically with low resolution and high densities where individuals cannot be detected. For this purpose, we propose a modified Xception network as the encoder for feature extraction and a combination of dilated convolution and transposed convolution as the decoder. When evaluated on the ShanghaiTech Part A, UCF and WorldExpo'10 datasets, our DENet has achieved lower Mean Absolute Error (MAE) than those of the state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available