3.8 Review

Barriers to the Provision and Utilization of Palliative Care in Africa: A Rapid Scoping Review

Journal

INDIAN JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 3-17

Publisher

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_355_20

Keywords

Africa; barriers; end-of-life care; Nigeria; palliative care; service provision

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scoping review on adult palliative care in Africa revealed individual, system, and relational barriers to the access and utilization of palliative care. The majority of studies reviewed used cross-sectional and retrospective study designs, highlighting the need for more qualitative research in this area. Future research could focus on exploring underlying factors to barriers and understanding ethno-religious perspectives on palliative care in Africa.
Palliative care (PC) has continued to be less available, underutilized, and unintegrated in many of the healthcare systems, especially in Africa. This scoping review synthesized existing published papers on adult PC in Africa, to report the barriers to PC and to assess the methodologies used in these studies. Eight electronic databases and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant studies published between 2005 and 2018. Overall, 42 publications (34 empirical studies and 9 reviews) that reported issues related to barriers to adult PC were selected. Three themes identified were individual-level, system-level, and relational barriers. The studies reviewed predominantly utilized cross-sectional and retrospective study design, underscoring the need for more studies employing qualitative design. Findings highlight the need for health education, training opportunities, more funding, communication, and timely referral. Future works could focus on underlying factors to these barriers and ethno-religious perspectives to PC in Africa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available