4.1 Review

Nano-Biomedicine based on Liquid Metal Particles and Allied Materials

Journal

ADVANCED NANOBIOMED RESEARCH
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anbr.202000086

Keywords

biomaterials; liquid metals; nano-biomedicine; nanoparticles; synthesis methods

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51890893, 81701850]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M641486, 2020T130660]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liquid metals with unique characteristics have emerged as promising materials for nanomedicine, offering exciting opportunities for biomedical applications. Advancements in synthesis methods and surface modifications have enabled diverse and state-of-the-art biomedical applications in this field.
Liquid metals (LMs) have emerged as a new class of functional materials with attractive characteristics of low melting points and metal properties. Remarkable features, such as biocompatibility, injectability, plasticity, conductivity, and shape transformability, have rendered them as excellent candidates to tackle challenging biomedical issues, such as tumor clinics, tissue engineering, and even nerve connection. Scaling down the droplet size offers more opportunities in surface engineering and functionalization, thus providing broad biomedical scenarios expanding from drug delivery, enhanced bioheat transfer, tumor therapeutics, and bioelectronics to nanorobots. Despite in its infancy stage, a summary about the advancement of LM biomedical nanomaterials is urgently needed. This review aims to highlight the advantages of gallium-based LM nanoparticles enabled nano-biomedicine, to summarize the recent synthesis methods with diverse LM compositions, structures and surface modifications, and to introduce their typical state-of-the-art biomedical applications. Challenges and opportunities are also discussed in the end.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available