4.5 Article

Factors Affecting Indonesian Preservice Teachers' Use of ICT During Teaching Practices Through Theory of Planned Behavior

Journal

SAGE OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21582440211027572

Keywords

use of ICT; theory of planned behavior; preservice teachers; Indonesia

Funding

  1. Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research indicates that the Theory of Planned Behavior is a valid model to explain Indonesian preservice teachers' use of information and communication technology during teaching practices. Normative beliefs are reported as the strongest predictor, and significant differences are found in terms of majors and universities.
The goals of the research were to inform whether the theory of planned behavior (TPB) is a valid model to explain Indonesian preservice teachers' (PSTs) use of information and communication technology (UICT) during teaching practices, to report best factor affecting PSTs' UICT during teaching practices, and to elaborate differences regarding UICT during teaching practices in terms of demographic information, gender, major, university, and information and communication technology (ICT)-based courses. The sample of this study was 1,133 PSTs from three Indonesian universities who completed a 24-item printed questionnaire of four constructs: behavioral beliefs (BB), normative beliefs (NB), control beliefs (CB), and UICT. Using partial least square-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), the results informed that the TPB is a valid model to help explain Indonesian PSTs' UICT during teaching practices. All constructs (BB, NB, and CB) significantly predict UICT during teaching practices where NB is reported to be the strongest predictor (beta = .354). There are no significant differences in terms of genders and ICT-based courses; however, significant differences are indicated in terms of majors and universities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available