4.7 Article

Holistic cognitive conflict chain management framework in supply chain management

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106564

Keywords

Supply chain management; Risk management; Policy matrix

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supply chain management is crucial for businesses, and this study proposes a holistic cognitive conflict chain management framework (HCCCMF) to enhance customer service quality and efficiency in supply chain management. The method utilizes behavioral monitoring analysis and policy matrix analysis to effectively manage disruptions and reduce costs in the supply chain.
Supply chain management is an integral part of most businesses and crucial to company performance and customer satisfaction. The demanding characteristics in supply chain management include lack of customer service quality, increased cost, risk management, and lack of inefficiency, which are considered indispensable factors in this research. This paper proposes a holistic cognitive conflict chain management framework (HCCCMF) to enhance quality customer service and supply chain management efficiency. This proposed HCCCMF method reduces interruption during the process and the cost of raw materials, labour, and energy in supply chain management. Behavioural monitoring analysis is carried out to improve quality service to consumers, creating an excellent customer-supplier relationship to function effectively in supply chain management. Policy matrix analysis is introduced to overcome disruptions during operation, which effectively manages affordable rates. The experimental results show that the proposed HCCCMF method enhances the productivity ratio of 94.3%, performance ratio of 98.4%, efficiency ratio of 96.5%, reliability ratio of 95.5%, accuracy ratio of 97.8%, and low trade cost ratio of 15.3% when compared to other existing methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available