4.6 Article

SYNTHETIC MINORITY OVERSAMPLING TECHNIQUE AND FRACTAL DIMENSION FOR IDENTIFYING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218348X17400102

Keywords

Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique; Canny Edge Detector; Fractal Dimension; Minkowski-Bouligand Dimension; Box Counting; Three-Segment Representation; Biogeography-Based Optimization

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61602250]
  2. Open Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Network Investigational Technology [2016WLZC013]
  3. Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Symbolic Computation and Knowledge Engineering of Ministry of Education, Jilin University [93K172016K17]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20150983]
  5. Program of Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [16KJB520025, 15KJB470010]
  6. Open fund for Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology [HGAMTL1601]
  7. Open fund of Key Laboratory of Guangxi High Schools Complex System and Computational Intelligence [2016CSCI01]
  8. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Digital Publishing Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a severe brain disease. Early detection can provide timely treatment. Fractal dimension can provide statistical index of pattern changes with scale at a given brain image. In this study, our team used susceptibility weighted imaging technique to obtain 676 MS slices and 880 healthy slices. We used synthetic minority oversampling technique to process the unbalanced dataset. Then, we used Canny edge detector to extract distinguishing edges. The Minkowski-Bouligand dimension was a fractal dimension estimation method and used to extract features from edges. Single hidden layer neural network was used as the classifier. Finally, we proposed a three-segment representation biogeography-based optimization to train the classifier. Our method achieved a sensitivity of 97.78 +/- 1.29%, a specificity of 97.82 +/- 1.60% and an accuracy of 97.80 +/- 1.40%. The proposed method is superior to seven state-of-the-art methods in terms of sensitivity and accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available