4.5 Article

A Geometric Analysis of Phase Retrieval

Journal

FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 1131-1198

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10208-017-9365-9

Keywords

Phase retrieval; Nonconvex optimization; Function landscape; Second-order geometry; Ridable saddles; Trust-region method; Inverse problems; Mathematical imaging

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. [ONR N00014-13-1-0492]
  4. [NSF CCF 1527809]
  5. [NSF IIS 1546411]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Can we recover a complex signal from its Fourier magnitudes? More generally, given a set of m measurements, for , is it possible to recover (i.e., length-n complex vector)? This generalized phase retrieval (GPR) problem is a fundamental task in various disciplines and has been the subject of much recent investigation. Natural nonconvex heuristics often work remarkably well for GPR in practice, but lack clear theoretic explanations. In this paper, we take a step toward bridging this gap. We prove that when the measurement vectors 's are generic (i.i.d. complex Gaussian) and numerous enough (), with high probability, a natural least-squares formulation for GPR has the following benign geometric structure: (1) There are no spurious local minimizers, and all global minimizers are equal to the target signal , up to a global phase, and (2) the objective function has a negative directional curvature around each saddle point. This structure allows a number of iterative optimization methods to efficiently find a global minimizer, without special initialization. To corroborate the claim, we describe and analyze a second-order trust-region algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available