4.0 Article

Simple dual-layer emitter for daytime radiative cooling

Journal

OSA CONTINUUM
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 416-427

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OSAC.398685

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61475073]
  2. Social Development Program of Taizhou [TS202020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates a simple dual-layer emitter for effective daytime radiative cooling, which consists of a silver film and a polydimethylsiloxane film. Experimental results show good performance of the emitter under different environmental conditions.
This work experimentally demonstrates a simple dual-layer emitter, which is easy to prepare and can be applied to effective daytime radiative cooling. The emitter consists of a 200-mu m-thick polydimethylsiloxane film on top of a 120-nm-thick Ag film, which is coated on a fused silica wafer or a plastic substrate. Due to the high reflectivity from the visible to the near-infrared and near-black emittance in the mid-infrared, the experimental results show that both structures have similar daytime radiative cooling performance. During the testing period, the typical ambient air temperature is 14-26 degrees C, the local wind speed is 1.6-2.6 m/s, and the relative humidity is 45-73%. We experimentally demonstrate that the emitter can achieve an average temperature reduction of about 3.3 degrees C from the ambient air temperature under direct sunlight. And the potential cooling power density is about 72.7 W/m(2). In the presence of non-ideal atmospheric conditions and significant non-radiative heat exchange, theoretical simulations are in good agreement with the measurements. This work indicates that the dual-layer emitter may be a key element in the realization of energy-efficient radiative cooling devices. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available