3.9 Article

Next generation of GIS: must be easy

Journal

ANNALS OF GIS
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 71-86

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19475683.2020.1766563

Keywords

Next generation of GIS; geo-computing platform; must be easy; high-performance computing; intelligent digital soil mapping; efficient digital terrain analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41871300, 41431177]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future GIS software needs to be user-friendly, goal-driven, and able to utilize high-performance computing for complex geographic analysis. This will allow users to easily achieve their goals without needing to know specific commands and sequences.
Existing GIS software mainly target at expert users and do not sufficiently integrate resources for efficient computing. They are difficult for non-experts to use and are often slow in completing the complicated geographic analysis. To address these problems, future generation of GIS software must be 'easy'. By 'easy' we mean 'easy to use' and 'easy to compute'. 'Easy to use' means that software system should be goal-oriented, rather than the currently procedure-oriented doctrine. The goal-oriented will relieve users, particularly novice users, the burden of knowing the exact commands and their sequences to perform for achieving the goal they want to achieve. 'Easy to compute' means that implementation of GIS analytical functionality should be able to utilize the high-performance computing infrastructures for complicated geographic analysis. Two case studies, one in digital soil mapping and the other in digital terrain analysis, are presented to illustrate the meaning of 'easy'. We believe that the future generations of GIS platforms should be goal-driven, intelligent, high-performance computing enabled, easily accessible, and participatory. It allows anyone to participate in geo-computation at anywhere and anytime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available