4.5 Article

Childhood adversity is associated with adulthood white blood cell count through narcissism

Journal

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110662

Keywords

Childhood harshness; Childhood unpredictability; Life history strategy; Dark Triad; White blood cell count

Funding

  1. Education Programs of National Social Science Fund of China [BBA170064]
  2. Henan Philosophy and Social Science Foundation [2019CJY038]
  3. Cultivation plan of excellent young scientific research team in Humanities and social sciences of Zhengzhou University - National Science Centre of Poland [2019/35/B/HS6/00682]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the impact of adverse childhood conditions on adult WBC count in women is mainly mediated by narcissism, while men are more likely to report childhood harshness, Machiavellianism, and psychopathic tendencies.
The immune system's response to threat is to amass protective white blood cells. We investigated (N = 234) individual differences in white blood cell (WBC) through the lens of life history theory by examining individual differences in (self-reported) childhood threats (i.e., unpredictability and harshness), life history speed, and the Dark Triad traits (i.e., Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy). People with adverse childhood conditions had faster life history strategies and higher Dark Triad traits, and were more prone to be inflamed (i.e., sexually transmitted infections). In addition, men reported more childhood harshness, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and a faster life history strategy and a higher WBC count than women did. Moreover, we revealed, through structural equation models, that the effects of childhood adversity on adult WBC count were mediated by narcissism especially in women. Results are discussed in terms of the mechanism underlying the association between childhood environments and physiological health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available