4.6 Article

Coexistence of topological edge states and skin effects in the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with long-range nonreciprocal hopping in topoelectric realizations

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 103, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.125411

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11374063, 11974082]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0303403]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation [19ZR1402900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, the study of topological phase in non-Hermitian systems has gained momentum, with a focus on the unique features of exceptional points and the non-Hermitian skin effect. A non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with long-range nonreciprocal hopping has been investigated and found to exhibit topologically nontrivial phases that can be characterized by the non-Bloch winding number. As implementation of long-range nonreciprocal hopping is challenging in experiments, a feasible electrical-circuit simulation using operational amplifiers has been proposed to realize these interesting states.
Recently, the topological phase in non-Hermitian systems has been a rapidly expanding field. The iconic features of non-Hermitian systems are exceptional points at which the eigenmodes coalesce and the non-Hermitian skin effect. We study the non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with long-range nonreciprocal hopping and find the model exhibiting topologically nontrivial phases which can be characterized by the non-Bloch winding number. With specific parameter values, the skin effect can be eliminated. As long-range nonreciprocal hopping is not easy for experimental implementations, we furthermore propose a feasible electrical-circuit simulation with operational amplifiers to implement the non-Hermitian term to realize these interesting states.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available