4.7 Article

Fungal diversity and succession following stand development in Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. plantations in Ethiopia

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 395, Issue -, Pages 9-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.032

Keywords

Edaphic factor; Fungal community; Pinus; Sporocarps; Stand age; Succession

Categories

Funding

  1. Erasmus Mundus-Dream project grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fungal communities associated to conifers have been typically studied in temperate conifer forests, but little is known about tropical habitats. The present study examined the macrofungal succession and corresponding sporocarp production in Pinus patula stands in Ethiopia. For this purpose, we surveyed nine permanent plots (100 m(2)) established in five-, eleven- and thirty-six years old P. patula plantations and estimated fungal taxa richness, diversity and sporocarp yields. Composite soil samples were also collected from each plot to determine explanatory edaphic variables for fungal taxa compositions. We found a total of 53 fungal taxa belonging to Basidiomycota, with the exception of Xylaria hypoxylon which is Ascomycota. The majority of the collected taxa were saprophytic and about 6% were ectomycorrhizal fungi. About 36% of the taxa were classified as edible. Taxa richness, the Shannon diversity index and sporocarp yields showed significant increasing trends towards the more mature P. patula stands. Fungal community composition was also correlated significantly with N, K and pH. This study extends our knowledge on fungal diversity and community structure in managed P. patula plantations. Higher diversity and sporocarp production was found in older stands. Thus, the deliberate presence of mature trees in Pinus stands could provide incentives for the production and conservation of ecologically and commercially important fungal species in the study area. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available