4.1 Review

An Application-Based Review of Haptics Technology

Journal

ROBOTICS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/robotics10010029

Keywords

haptic devices; kinesthetic feedback; medical training; augmented reality; wearable devices; teleoperation

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [2019-05562]
  2. Ryerson Dean of Engineering and Architectural Science Research Fund (DRF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent technological advancements have led to the creation of various designs of haptic devices, which act as electromechanical devices facilitating communication between users and computers. These devices enable users to interact with virtual objects while receiving tactile feedback. The paper categorizes the applications of haptic devices based on construction and functionality across a range of industries, and discusses limitations and future prospects of this technology.
Recent technological development has led to the invention of different designs of haptic devices, electromechanical devices that mediate communication between the user and the computer and allow users to manipulate objects in a virtual environment while receiving tactile feedback. The main criteria behind providing an interactive interface are to generate kinesthetic feedback and relay information actively from the haptic device. Sensors and feedback control apparatus are of paramount importance in designing and manufacturing a haptic device. In general, haptic technology can be implemented in different applications such as gaming, teleoperation, medical surgeries, augmented reality (AR), and virtual reality (VR) devices. This paper classifies the application of haptic devices based on the construction and functionality in various fields, followed by addressing major limitations related to haptics technology and discussing prospects of this technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available