Journal
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jdb9010008
Keywords
tooth development; molar initiation; craniodental integration; 3D imaging; synchrotron scanning
Categories
Funding
- Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
- National Research Council (NRC)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- NSERC [2011-402148, 2016-05177, 2014-05563]
- CFI Research Infrastucture Grant [29037]
- NSERC
- College of Medicine (USask)
- NSERC Undergraduate Summer Research Awards
- USask College of Medicine
- CHIR-Techniques in Health Research Using Synchrotron Tools
- Government of Saskatchewan
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Research suggests that the initiation time and developmental duration of molars in the upper and lower jaws are comparable, despite differences in retromolar space and molar sizes. This indicates that the timing of molar formation may not be influenced by jaw length and space, but rather by conditions within the dental lamina. The physical reorganization of dental epithelium and its impact on underlying mesenchyme may play a crucial role in molar onset.
For humans and other mammals to eat effectively, teeth must develop properly inside the jaw. Deciphering craniodental integration is central to explaining the timely formation of permanent molars, including third molars which are often impacted in humans, and to clarifying how teeth and jaws fit, function and evolve together. A factor long-posited to influence molar onset time is the jaw space available for each molar organ to form within. Here, we tested whether each successive molar initiates only after a minimum threshold of space is created via jaw growth. We used synchrotron-based micro-CT scanning to assess developing molars in situ within jaws of C57BL/6J mice aged E10 to P32, encompassing molar onset to emergence. We compared total jaw, retromolar and molar lengths, and molar onset times, between upper and lower jaws. Initiation time and developmental duration were comparable between molar upper and lower counterparts despite shorter, slower-growing retromolar space in the upper jaw, and despite size differences between upper and lower molars. Timing of molar formation appears unmoved by jaw length including space. Conditions within the dental lamina likely influence molar onset much more than surrounding jaw tissues. We theorize that molar initiation is contingent on sufficient surface area for the physical reorganization of dental epithelium and its invagination of underlying mesenchyme.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available