4.6 Article

Energy-time-entangled two-photon molecular absorption

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.033701

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation through the Sinergia grant [CRSII5-170981]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation the PRIMA starting grant [PR00P2_179748]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PR00P2_179748, CRSII5_170981] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study experimentally demonstrates the linear dependence of entangled two-photon absorption (ETPA) rate with the photon-pair rate and estimates the concentration-dependent ETPA cross section for Rhodamine 6G. It also investigates the signature of energy-time entanglement and polarization dependence in the ETPA fluorescence rate, showing a strong dependence of the signal on the interphoton delay.
Nonlinear spectroscopy and microscopy techniques are ubiquitous in a wide range of applications across physics and biology. However, these usually rely on high-powered pulsed laser systems. A promising alternative is to exploit entangled two-photon absorption (ETPA), which can lead to tens of orders of magnitude lower incident fluxes than in conventional two-photon absorption schemes. However, the role of different entangled degrees of freedom in ETPA was unclear following recent experimental studies, when compared to earlier theoretical works. Here, we first demonstrate a linear dependence of the ETPA rate with the photon-pair rate, a clear signature of ETPA, and estimate the values for the concentration-dependent ETPA cross section for Rhodamine 6G. We then investigate the signature of energy-time entanglement and polarization dependence in the ETPA fluorescence rate and demonstrate a strong dependence of the signal on the interphoton delay that reflects the coherence time of the entangled two-photon wave packet.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available