4.7 Article

Alignment of axial anisotropy of a mononuclear hexa-coordinated Co(ii) complex in a lattice shows improved single molecule magnetic behavior over a 2D coordination polymer having a similar ligand field

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 50, Issue 8, Pages 2832-2840

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0dt04065g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CSIR Government of India [01(2974)/19/EMR-II]
  2. IISER Bhopal
  3. CSIR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two Co-II based complexes with distinct structures and magnetic properties were synthesized and characterized. Complex 1 exhibited a higher field-induced slow relaxation of magnetization at higher temperatures compared to complex 2. The alignment of anisotropic axes in complex 1 enhanced the axial anisotropy, resulting in a higher energy barrier.
Two Co-II based complexes namely [Co(IAP)(SCN)(2)] (1) and {[Co(IPEH)(2)(SCN)(2)]center dot H2O}(n) (2) (where IPEH = (((1E,2E)-1,2-bis(1-(4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)phenyl)ethylidene)hydrazine) and IAP = (4 '-(imidazol-1-yl)acetophenone)) have been synthesized and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, magnetic measurements and ab initio calculations. Structural analysis revealed that complex 1 has a zero-dimensional mononuclear structure and complex 2 has a two-dimensional framework where the Co-II centers are bridged by bis(monodentate) ligand IPEH. In both the complexes, the Co-II center has a distorted octahedral geometry with a CoN6 coordination environment, formed by four equatorial N atoms from the neutral ligand and two NCS- at the axial positions. Detailed magnetic measurements reveal the presence of easy-plane magnetic anisotropy for both the complexes, whereas the field-induced slow relaxation of magnetization is observed at a relatively higher temperature in 1 (above 2 K, U-eff = 30 K) as compared to 2 (below 2 K, U-eff = 6.5 K). The ab initio calculations show the negligible effect of the first coordination sphere as similar anisotropic parameters are obtained for both the complexes. Additionally, it was found that the anisotropic axes are aligned well in a particular direction in complex 1 whereas it is randomly oriented in the framework of 2. The parallel orientation of the anisotropic axes enhances the axial anisotropy and reduces the transverse component, resulting in a higher energy barrier (U-eff = 30 K) in complex 1. The detailed analysis of field and temperature dependence of relaxation time indicates that Raman, direct and QTM processes mainly play an important role in the relaxation dynamics of complex 1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available