4.7 Article

Switching decision, timing, and app performance: An empirical analysis of mobile app developers' switching behavior between monetization strategies

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages 332-345

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.027

Keywords

Mobile apps; App store; App monetization strategy; Simultaneous equations model; Fixed effects estimation; Mobile app marketing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals that mobile application developers' switching behavior is influenced by prior performance and duration, with better-performing apps tending to remain in the paid strategy. Developers are more likely to switch to a free strategy when the performance of a paid app declines. The duration of the app in each strategy and switching behavior have significant effects on subsequent app performance, with varying impacts based on app category.
Mobile application developers switch their monetization strategies for strategic purposes. We investigate the determinants and consequences of app developers' switching behavior between paid and free strategies over time. Using large-scale daily app rank data from the iOS App Store, our estimations reveal that the prior performance of an app and its duration of staying in a monetization strategy significantly impact the developers' decision of switching. We also find that better-performing apps tend to have longer stays in the paid strategy, whereas developers tend to switch their monetization strategy to free when the performance of a paid app declines. Furthermore, app developers' switching behavior and duration of the app in each strategy have significant effects on the subsequent app performance in the App Store. Finally, we find the impact of switching behavior varies by app category. Managerial implications with estimated economic outcomes on strategic moves by app developers towards higher app performance are provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available