4.4 Article

Past and present outage costs ? A follow-up study of households? willingness to pay to avoid power outages

Journal

RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2021.101216

Keywords

Power outage; Stated preferences; Sweden

Funding

  1. Swedish Energy Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Households' demand for electricity is increasing, leading to a willingness to pay more to avoid power outages. The study found that in 2017, more households were willing to pay to avoid power outages compared to 2004, with a higher overall willingness to pay, but a decrease in conditional willingness to pay among those with a positive willingness to pay for an outage.
Households' demand for electricity continues to increase. This trend per se should indicate increased disutility from power outages. Additionally, batteries and other back-up systems have been improved, and the frequency and duration of outages have been reduced in many countries. By comparing the results from two stated preference studies on Swedish households' willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid power outages in 2004 and 2017, we investigate whether the WTP has changed. The WTP is assessed for power outages of 1-and 4-h durations, and whether it is planned or unplanned. We find three main differences: (i) the proportion of households stating zero WTP to avoid power outages decreased significantly from 2004 to 2017, meaning that more households are willing to pay to avoid a power outage in 2017 than in 2004; (ii) the overall WTP was considerably higher in 2017 than in 2004, but (iii) the conditional WTP, that is, WTP for those that have a positive WTP for an outage, has decreased. These results have implications for how regulators incentivize and regulate electricity suppliers, because the results suggest that a reliable supply of electricity is of greater importance now than what the literature has suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available