MAINTAINING STRATEGIC AMBIGUITY FOR PROTECTION: STRUGGLES OVER OPACITY, EQUIVOCALITY, AND ABSURDITY AROUND THE SICILIAN MAFIA

In spite of an increasing interest in ambiguity, our knowledge of how organizations maintain strategic ambiguity to protect themselves from public scrutiny is still in its infancy. Through an in-depth historical study of the Sicilian Mafia between 1963 and 2018, we develop a model of strategic ambiguity maintenance. We focus on three struggles between the Mafia and state representatives, and show how these struggles centered on different types of ambiguity: ambiguity as opacity, equivocality, and absurdity. We elaborate on the strategies enacted by the Mafia and the responses by state representatives and their implications for ambiguity over time. The main contribution of our paper is that it advances understanding of the maintenance of strategic ambiguity by organizations that need to protect themselves from public scrutiny. More specifically, it enriches our knowledge of the key process dynamics, the types of struggles, and the discursive and nondiscursive strategies employed in the process. Our analysis also extends research on clandestine organizations and illuminates the relationship between (strategic) ambiguity and secrecy.

Automated summary

This study presents a model for understanding how organizations maintain strategic ambiguity to avoid public scrutiny, using the Sicilian Mafia as a case study. By analyzing the struggles and strategies between the Mafia and state representatives, it contributes to the knowledge of the dynamics, struggles, and strategies involved in maintaining ambiguity. Additionally, it expands research on clandestine organizations and sheds light on the relationship between (strategic) ambiguity and secrecy.